Your Flashcards are Ready!
15 Flashcards in this deck.
Topic 2/3
15 Flashcards in this deck.
The Law of Demand states that, ceteris paribus (all other factors being equal), as the price of a good or service increases, the quantity demanded by consumers decreases, and vice versa. This negative relationship ensures that consumers are more willing to purchase higher quantities of a good when its price falls.
Graphically, the Law of Demand is represented by a downward-sloping demand curve on a price-quantity graph. The vertical axis denotes the price, while the horizontal axis represents the quantity demanded. The downward slope signifies that lower prices lead to higher quantities demanded.
$$ Q_d = f(P) $$Where \( Q_d \) is the quantity demanded and \( P \) is the price of the good.
Several factors influence the quantity demanded of a good, shifting the demand curve either to the right (increase in demand) or to the left (decrease in demand). These determinants include:
While the Law of Demand holds in most scenarios, certain exceptions challenge the conventional relationship between price and quantity demanded:
Price elasticity of demand measures how sensitive the quantity demanded is to a change in price. It is calculated as:
$$ \text{Price Elasticity of Demand} = \frac{\% \text{ Change in Quantity Demanded}}{\% \text{ Change in Price}} $$Depending on the elasticity, the demand can be classified as:
A distinction is made between movements along the demand curve and shifts of the demand curve:
Individual Demand: Refers to the quantity demanded by a single consumer at various price levels.
Market Demand: The aggregate of all individual demands in the market. It represents the total quantity demanded by all consumers at each price level.
Consider the market for smartphones. If the price of a particular smartphone model decreases from $800 to $600, consumers are likely to purchase more units, demonstrating an increase in quantity demanded. Conversely, if the price rises to $1000, the quantity demanded may decrease as consumers seek cheaper alternatives or forego the purchase.
Another example is gasoline. When gasoline prices decline, consumers may choose to drive more, increasing the quantity demanded. If prices surge, consumers may reduce driving frequency or switch to alternative transportation methods.
Aspect | Movement Along Demand Curve | Shift of Demand Curve |
---|---|---|
Cause | Change in the price of the good | Change in non-price determinants (income, preferences, etc.) |
Effect | Change in quantity demanded | Change in demand at all price levels |
Direction | Movement upward or downward along the existing curve | Entire curve shifts right (increase) or left (decrease) |
Graphical Representation | Movement to a different point on the same curve | New curve parallel to the original |
Examples | Price drop of a laptop leading to increased purchases | Increase in consumer income boosting demand for electronics |
• Use Graphs Effectively: Practice drawing and interpreting demand curves to visualize movements and shifts clearly.
• Memorize Key Determinants: Remember the main factors that shift demand: income, prices of related goods, preferences, expectations, and number of buyers.
• Apply Real-World Examples: Relate concepts to current events or personal experiences to deepen understanding and recall during exams.
• Practice Elasticity Calculations: Familiarize yourself with calculating and interpreting price elasticity to handle related AP questions confidently.
1. Historical Origins: The Law of Demand was first formally articulated by the English economist Sir Alfred Marshall in his 1890 work, "Principles of Economics." Marshall's insights laid the foundation for modern demand theory.
2. Behavioral Economics: Behavioral economists have found instances where consumer behavior deviates from the Law of Demand due to psychological factors, such as the desire for fairness or the impact of branding.
3. Global Markets: In developing countries, the Law of Demand can manifest differently. For example, in regions with limited access to substitutes, demand may be less sensitive to price changes.
1. Confusing Movement with Shift: Students often mistake a movement along the demand curve (caused by a price change) with a shift of the demand curve (caused by a change in determinants). For example, assuming that an increase in income moves along the curve rather than shifting it rightward.
2. Ignoring Ceteris Paribus: Forgetting to hold other factors constant can lead to incorrect conclusions. For instance, attributing a decrease in demand solely to a price increase without considering changes in consumer income.
3. Misclassifying Goods: Misidentifying normal goods as inferior or vice versa can distort analysis. Understanding whether a good is normal or inferior is crucial for predicting how income changes affect demand.